An explicit editorial workflow
Planning distinguishes planned, in-progress, in-review, changes-requested, approved and cancelled content. Move to review when copy and media are ready; request changes when an issue prevents approval.
These statuses describe editorial progress. Network delivery status is tracked separately. Approval alone therefore does not prove publication.
A two-person campaign example
Fictional demonstration: one person prepares three launch posts and a second checks prices, images and links. Each comment refers to the relevant version. A consolidated review avoids contradictory changes.
Before scheduling, the owner confirms the destination account, timezone and approved version. If the image changes, review it again; do not automatically carry over the previous approval.
Define responsibilities
Access depends on organization membership and permissions. Assign who drafts, decides and schedules, and check those permissions in your workspace. NudgeTask does not replace team decisions with implicit timeout approvals.
External clients need the appropriate access and workflow. This page does not promise an anonymous review portal or account-free approval. For a complex process, test the required roles before migrating content.
Start with one campaign
Create the project and brief, choose a reviewer, prepare one post per network and define a deadline. Use the free generator to draft your process, then apply it in planning.
Track time from first draft to approval, number of revisions and posts delayed by missing approval. These measures show where to adjust the process.